It Is Better to Prepare 10 Years Too Early Than 10 Minutes Too Late: The 5 Places In America You DON’T Want To Be When Society Collapses

PREPAREDNESS
12

What would you say is the number one threat to lead to an end-of-the-world-like scenario? A terrorist attack? An EMP strike? A natural disaster? An economic collapse?

All of these are possibilities, but in each one, a thick population density will make it far worse. There’s no denying that people panic when a crisis occurs, and that panic is only multiplied when more people are living closely to one another.

More people will be killed in a shorter period of time in the major cities, the roads will be clogged as people and families try to escape, and furthermore, just look at the other threats that we listed first. Many of them are directly connected to population density.

If an economic collapse were to occur, then urbanized cities would be simply unable to rebuild their economies as fast as more rural areas (with coal mining, logging, farmer’s markets, etc.) could.

There are other factors that make certain areas in America unsafe and unsuitable for outlasting an apocalypse:

  • Strong natural disaster risks
  • A weak economy
  • High crime rates
  • Strict gun laws
  • A high cost of living
  • High taxes
  • Heavy traffic
  • Unfertile land for growing crops
  • Close proximity to nuclear/chemical power plants
  • Low populations of wild game and edible plants
  • Limited fresh water

In this story, we’re going to list out the five very worst retreat areas in the United States. These are the areas where you will definitely not want to be when disaster strikes, and if you live in or near any of these areas now, you may want to consider moving or have an alternate plan:

1. East Coast

Many survival and disaster experts agree that the East and West Coasts together are among the worst locations to survive a long-term disaster in the United States. This is because both meet the “unsafe factors” we just outlined. High population density? Check. High cost of living? Check.  Strict Gun Laws? For the Northeastern states, check. High crime rate? In many cities, yes. High taxes and regulations? In the Northeastern states yes. Heavy traffic? Check. Threat of natural disaster, namely hurricanes? Check. Low populations of wild game and edible plants? Check. Potential enemy nuclear targets? For the major cities, definitely.

As a general rule of thumb, avoid anywhere along the East Coast if you can. It’s simply not a safe place if you want to survive a disaster. If you do live on or near the East Coast, fall back to retreat areas in the Appalachian Mountains or northern New England, like New Hampshire or Maine, when worst comes to worst.

2. West Coast

Many of our concerns expressed with the East Coast apply to the West Coast as well. The largest state along the West Coast, California, is already an economic disaster and thus not somewhere you would want to be in an economic collapse. Washington and Oregon are both, by far, better off economic-wise, but they still have their problems with high taxes, tough regulations and large government spending. The major cities of San Diego, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Seattle have extremely high population densities and are potential terrorist/nuclear targets.

In addition, the West Coast lies along the Ring of Fire, which adds earthquakes to the list of natural disaster risks to worry about. If you don’t think earthquakes are that big of a deal, well, just look at what happened to Japan in 2011. Plus, in Washington, you have volcanoes. All in all, both the East and West Coasts are dangerous hotspots in an apocalyptic-type scenario and are not recommended.

3. Florida

Florida, in general, is not somewhere you will want to be during a disaster. Not to mention the ever looming threat of hurricanes in the state, Florida also endures a high crime rate, a collapsed housing market and high costs of living, a very dense population, and the fact that much of the state is actually below sea level (the parts of the state that are higher aren’t above it by much).

There’s no denying that Florida has nice weather, which is why many people move there in the first place, but its negatives far outweigh its positives to the point that it’s one of the worst retreat locations you could be in for outlasting a long-term disaster.

4. Alaska

Woah, woah, wait, Alaska? The so-called “last frontier” in America is one of the worst places to survive an apocalypse? First of all, Alaska does have a few positives (not to mention the beauty of its geography) that would make it an initially attractive place to live for someone who wants to be in a safe region from a major disaster. It is true that Alaska has the lowest population density of all 50 states, along with low tax rates. It also has a great abundance of rivers, lakes, wildlife and edible plants.

But when we come to economics, Alaska is practically cut off from the rest of the United States. A lot of the supplies that Alaskans rely on are either flown or shipped into the state. In a disaster scenario, these planes and ships will likely no longer be making shipments, greatly limiting available resources. Furthermore, those who live more inland in Alaska will be extremely limited in what they can do with commerce.

Remember when we noted that the West Coast of the USA is prone to earthquakes due to being situated along the Ring of Fire? Well, so is Alaska. There’s also very limited transportation to get oil from the North Slope to where it needs to go, and much of the fuel that Alaskans use is already brought in from the Lower 48 states. The winters in Alaska can also be quite cold and brutal.

Alaska may seem like the prepper’s haven, but on closer inspection it becomes apparent that you’re going to have a much tougher time surviving there than you would think. This is one place you may want to avoid, unless you know how to live 100 percent off the grid.

5. Hawaii

Like Florida, Hawaii may be a great place to vacation, but it’s an utterly terrible location to be in during an apocalyptic scenario. Most of Hawaii’s resources, as with Alaska, are shipped in.  This includes food and fuel. That’s on top of a very high cost of living in the state coupled with generally poor farming soil.

Gun laws are very strict in the state, and there are many military bases on the islands that could be the targets of enemy attacks. Let’s also not forget one more thing: Should a big enough natural disaster ever happen to Hawaii, how will you escape? After all, it’s a series of islands in the middle of the Pacific Ocean. Unless you have access to a plane or a ship, you may be toast.

Every region in the US certainly has its pros and cons, but these are the areas where the cons outweigh the positives the most.

You are way off on Florida being below sea level. Maybe some places in the glades but almost everywhere the streets are about 25 feet above sea level with your homes a few feet higher than the streets. You must be thinking of New Orleans. As far as hurricanes we got this last year but it was the first in 11 years.

Good article. The best place to be is in on the North American Craton at 900 feet plus of elevation in a very rural setting. Having plenty of food and water storage would be a plus too if and when the supply chain breaks down.

I believe you are absolutely correct in your diagnosis. I live in San Diego and call it Ground Zero with the Naval Air Station at Mira-Mar, and the Marine training center at Camp Pendleton. San Diego is also the base for some two or three Aircraft Carriers and a few submarines as well as North Island, which is another naval air station. With I-5 and I-15 the only two highways north, both are headed into LA, and only one main highway east I-8, of which all three would become plugged in short order leaving everyone with nowhere to go but south into Mexico, yeah, like that is someplace I want to live? NOT! I’d take my chances with marauders here in the states than with the murderous drug cartel ruling Mexico.

I’ll hunker down here and take my chances, but if it comes to a nuclear attack, (check Nuc Maps; http://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/ ) We be toast with just a small one Megaton nuclear bomb. More than likely Camp Pendleton would be saved. Personally I don’t think they would waste a bomb trying to take out the military, but it might be advantageous just to take out large segments of our population. That one megaton bomb over Central San Diego would kill about 300,000 people and render another half million with injuries. If a four megaton Nuc hit Los Angles it would take out 850,000 with almost a million and half with injuries. Radiation from either would head east to infect any and all growing regions east within 50 miles or so.

The prospects are not bright when it comes to nuclear weapons, but if there is multiple EMP attacks we may actually lose more than all those bombed cities combined through starvation and having no water. If there is an Economic Collapse then no problem, we’ll just shoot the neighbors dog and eat it. (just kidding). In any case those who are armed will rule the aftermath !

I would have to differ with you on Alaska. we grow our own food up here, and have many ways of preserving food, there are moose, deer, rabbits, caribou and wild birds that people can hunt. and there are probably more people up here living off the grid than from the lower 48;s, per capita. there are a LOT of people up here who have been preparing for when the shtf.

Agreed! Where do we go now.. not everyone is a natural born farmer.. and not everyone is a self sufficient /healthy male head of household ready to blacksmith and plow the fields… : /

I live in Washington State. God help us here because our state & local governments are made up of idiots! Their more concerned with getting rid of plastic shopping bags & safe injection sites? The legislature passed a bill making it illegal to have a nuclear response plan to help the general population. The governor is referred to as sleepily Jay Inslee, most fitting for a do nothing democrat. So you see we’re doomed here in Washington 😧

You need to move; Idaho is great and we would love to have as many more conservatives as we can get to battle the liberals who would like to take over the state.

With prices of everything exploding upward on an hourly basis,Land/property,included,it has become nearly impossible,if not impossible for the average person to make the move to a “Better” location!! the only choice then becomes,”Make the best of the situation you are in and Stock up to the best of one’s financial ability and also make sure to Lock and Load!!

12 Comments

Leave a Reply

PREPAREDNESS
2
Your Weapon Is Only Tool to Survive: The Tactics of a Gunfight After SHTF

Looking around I couldn’t find an important piece of information – how one should fight in a SHTF situation. I think this is an important topic to cover because it has several special circumstances that need to be considered. Ammo will need to be conserved – I don’t care how many rounds …

PREPAREDNESS
5
A Working Vehicle Could Be The Difference Between Life And Death Once An EMP Event Strikes: Top 10 Vehicles For Your EMP Survival

Thirty years ago, most of the cars used carburetors, and only a few people believed that electromagnetic pulse (EMP) is a real threat. Nowadays, even NASA admits that EMP is one of those events we could not recover from: it would stop all infrastructures that sustain modern society which rely so much on electronics. No communication, …

PREPAREDNESS
Home Defense Should Be A Serious Consideration For All Homeowners: Best Gun For Home Defense

There are few things more likely to start a fight than the discussion of firearms and more specifically, what the best options for a defensive weapon are if you are just starting your emergency preparations. Speaking of opinions, I have my own on the subject of the best weapon you can …